Newsletter
Two smart people find much to fear in the UK government's views on judicial review. For what it's worth, I feel the same. And a fundamental, and discriminatory, misunderstanding of objectivity.
Newsletter
Right back atcha, CRED.
Newsletter
16 ounces. 8 pints. 32 degrees. Really? And thought-provoking writing on persuading the unpersuadable.
Newsletter
With less than a week to go before new rules on witness statements in commercial litigation come into force, the problem remains: do lawyers still know how to ask questions?
Newsletter
Why condemning a little less and understanding a little more leads to better advocacy, and better humanity. Plus 20 years of a timeless operating system. And woodblock prints to take your breath away.
Newsletter
Fat ships and hydrodynamics. And GCHQ makes the most of the fact that one of my heroes is now on a banknote.
Newsletter
The slipperiness of statistics, and why us advocates need to learn to love numbers. Plus: wise words from the US on design.
Newsletter
Like many ex-hacks, I take fonts seriously. Clearly US judges don't - or rather, they do for the wrong reasons. More fool them.
Newsletter
How long can Uber's "labour law arbitrage business" last?
Newsletter
The government's shameful misuse of the Sarah Everard affair to shore up support for an illiberal bill. And why video shouldn't supplant the chance to walk and talk.
Newsletter
A message of hope for procrastinators everywhere. And a depressing but unsurprising long read about Facebook's damaging take on AI ethics.
Newsletter
"My life has been one long risk assessment." For most of us men, ours hasn't, and we need to recognise what that means.